This IS evidence Trump raped underaged girls.
‘Need to Know’ in this report:
- The witness statement of the primary witness, from redacted file, we call Cindy Doe.
- Her witness testimony is corroborated by Tiffany Doe, who worked for Epstein for 10 years.
- Download the files, see for yourself, check with her attorney and the courts, report the evidence.
MEDIA NOTE:
Trump and his DOJ and related departments, that are quite apparently helping to try to bury this case and Trumps relationship with Epstein, need to answer questions regarding these witness statements. And what does Mike Johnson think?
Just because it never made it to court because Donald Trump, and/or cohorts of Trump, ensured the girls and witnesses received death threats against themselves and their families does not change the fact that this is evidence. Corroborated by multiple witnesses. The case files (see below) were filed in 2016 in multiple US district courts. The first file I originally found a court server is no longer where I found it. Trump is intimidating the courts, politicians, and American citizens with a wide array of threats including ICE sweeping up citizens. So in fear of retaliation and general threat he is suppressing actions against him. If he doesn’t want evidence known he uses the full force of government to help create distractions and obfuscations to keep people focused elsewhere. The question remains, will they go so far as to destroy evidence in the Epstein case, or just make it go away?
Politico has been tracking these cases since 2016 and has the most complete reporting online regarding Trump and Epstein raping 12 and 13 year olds (in these cases). Thus, any news organization that wants to do follow up might want to contact them.
Media Note: Just because it hasn’t been presented in court does not mean it is not evidence. This can be presented for what it is. EVIDENCE. Media and News organizations can present this as evidence in its context: victims and witness statements and reports.
Donald J. Trump does not want the public paying attention to this story. You can count on him coming up with more and more outrageous distractions like arresting Former President Obama and of course other ridiculous things as his MAGA followers learn more and more about his depravity. The evidence speaks for itself. Trumps deniAls and distractions also speak to his fear regarding the truth of these matters. DON’T BE DISTRACTED BY THE SHOW. PAY ATTENTION TO THE REAL STORY HERE. THINK ABOUT THIS: THE PHRASE ‘A MAN IN INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY’ IS A COURTROOM AND LEGAL PHRASE. THAT DOES NOT MEAN YOU, OR I, CAN’T JUDGE HIM BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND PATTERNS OF BEHAVIOR IN HIS LIFE. INDIVIDUAL JUDGEMENT IS NOT THE SAME AS LEGAL OR JUDICIAL JUDGEMENT. DONALD TRUMP AS ALREADY BEEN FOUND GUILTY AS A SEXUAL ABUSER AND IN MOST OTHER JURISDICTIONS HIS CASE IN NEW YORK WOULD HAVE RESULTED IN A JUDGEMENT OF RAPE. THE EVIDENCE SAYS HE IS A RAPIST AND A SEXUAL ABUSER, AND A GENERALLY DISGUSTING HUMAN BEING. THAT IS A FAIR STATEMENT.
These are the filed witness statements and as such are evidence of Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein’s conduct. The fact that all additional evidence points to the fact that Cindy Doe, Jane Doe, and Maria Doe were intimidated to not go further with the case due to death threats does not eliminate the evidence in hand. It leaves the case ‘result’ as an unknown. This case should still be brought to trial, but Donald Trump has proven over and over again how menacing and dangerous he and his administration can be.
Cindy Doe, then 13 years old and another girl (unnamed as Maria Doe – age 12) never brought the case to trial because Donald Trump was elected President and both girls and their families were threatened and remain under threat.
Victims as named in the filing include:
- Cindy Doe, age 13 (This pseudonym is used to mask an alternate filing that we are not including in the PDF’s in this posted report. While it was reported the original name was also a pseudonym, we have altered the pseudonym as an additional layer of risk reduction to the victim.)
- Maria Doe, age 12
- Jane Doe, age 13
Material witness:
- Tiffany Doe (employed by Epstein for 10 years)
Had Donald Trump not become president, the case might have actually gone to trial. Considering the way Trump threatens people one should consider the courage it took for Cindy Doe to have brought the case as far as she did.
EXCERPTED FROM CALIFORNIA CASE FILE:
Plaintiff: Cindy Doe (age 13 at time of reported rape and abuse)
FILED FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
The Plaintiff, Cindy Doe, alleges that the Defendants, Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey E. Epstein, did willfully and with extreme malice violate her Civil Rights under 18 U.S.C. ; 2241 by sexually and physically abusing Plaintiff Cindy Doe by forcing her to engage in various perverted and depraved sex acts by threatening physical harm to Plaintiff Cindy Doe and also her family.
The evidentiary witness statements include the following:
- Defendants Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey E. Epstein conspired to make her their sex slave.
- …subject to extreme sexual and physical abuse of a four month time span.
- …enticed by money and a modeling career at parties at Epstein’s residence attended by Donald Trump.
- First occasion, 13 year old Cindy Doe was forced to manually stimulate Defendant Trump with the use of her hand upon Trump’s erect penis until he reached orgasm.
- Second occasion, 13 year old Cindy Doe was forced to orally copulate Defendant Trump by placing her mouth upon Defendant Trump’s erect penis until he reached orgasm.
- Third occasion, 13 year old Cindy Doe was forced to engage in lesbian sex act with her fellow minor and sex slave, (Maria Doe age 12), for the sexual enjoyment of Defendant Trump by placing their mouths simultaneously on his erect penis until he achieved sexual orgasm. After zipping his pants, Defendant Trump physically pushed both minors away while angrily berating them for the “poor” quality of their sexual performance.
- On the fourth and final sexual encounter with Defendant Trump, Cindy Doe (age 13), was tied to a bed by defendant Trump who then proceeded to forcibly rape Plaintiff Cindy Doe. During the course of this savage sexual attack, Cindy Doe loudly pleaded with Trump to “please wear a condom”.
- Trump responded by violently striking Cindy Doe in the face with his open hand and screaming that “he would do whatever he wanted” as he refused to wear protection. After achieving sexual orgasm, Donald J. Trump put his suit back on and when Cindy Doe, in tears asked Trump what would happen if he had impregnated her, Trump grabbed his wallet and threw some money at her and screamed that she should use the money “to get a fucking abortion“.
Regarding the first encounter with Jeffrey Epstein, and consequent encounters involving Epstein and Trump:
- On the first occasion involving Jeffrey E. Epstein, and the Plaintiff, Cindy Doe was forced to disrobe into her bra and panties and give a full body massage to Defendant Epstein while he was completely naked. During the massage, Epstein forced Cindy Doe (age 13) to touch his erect penis with her bare hands and to clean up his ejaculated semen after he achieved sexual orgasm.
- On the second occasion with Epstein, Trump was also present getting his own massage by another girl mentioned as Jane Doe (then age 13). Cindy Doe was again forced to disrobe into her bra and panties while giving Epstein a full body massage while he was completely naked, touch his erect penis and forced to clean up his semen after he achieved sexual orgasm.
- Shortly after this sexual assault, Cindy Doe was present while the two defendants argued over show would be the one to take Cindy Doe’s virginity. Defendant Donald J. Trump was clearly heard referring to Defendant Epstein as a “Jew Bastard” as he yelled at Epstein that clearly he, Trump, should be the lucky one to “pop the cherry” of Plaintiff Cindy Doe.
- The third and final assault by Epstein on the Plaintiff Cindy Doe took place after Cindy Doe had been brutally and savagely raped by Donald Trump. While receiving another full body massage by Plaintiff Cindy Doe, while in the nude, Defendant Epstein became so enraged after finding out that Trump had been the one to take Plaintiff Cindy Doe’s virginity that Epstein also violently raped Cindy Doe.
- -Epstein attempted to enter Cindy Doe’s anal cavity with his erect penis while trying to restrain her. Cindy Doe attempted to push Epstein away at which time Epstein attempted to enter her vagina with his erect penis.
- –This attempt to brutally sodomize and rape Plaintiff Cindy Doe was finally repelled by Cindy Doe but not before Epstein was able to achieve sexual orgasm. After perversely sodomizing and raping the plaintiff, Epstein attempted to strike her about the head with his closed fists while he angrily screamed at Plaintiff Cindy Doe that he should have been the one to “took her cherry, not Mr. Trump”, before she finally managed to break away from Epstein.
- -Epstein attempted to enter Cindy Doe’s anal cavity with his erect penis while trying to restrain her. Cindy Doe attempted to push Epstein away at which time Epstein attempted to enter her vagina with his erect penis.
Cindy Doe was fully warned on more than one occasion by both Trump and Epstein that were she ever to reveal any of the details of the sexual and physical abuse that she had suffered as a sex slave for Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, that she and her family would be in mortal danger. Cindy Doe was warned that this would mean certain death for herself, and her family, unless she remained silent forever on the exact details of the depraved and perverted sexual and physical abuse she had been forced to endure from the Defendants.
The material witness:
Tiffany Doe, whom had worked for Epstein for ten years was also to appear should this have gone to trial. Here testimony would reveal and verify:
- The authenticity of the claims of Cindy Doe
- That she was also subjected to terrorist threats should she reveal details of these underage sex parties.
- Scores of teenagers and pre-teen girls were used as sex slaves for Epstein and Trump.
- …the extent of the sexual perversion and physical cruelty that she personally witnessed at these parties by Epstein and Trump.
- …that she fully confirms all of Cindy Doe’s allegations of physical and sexual abuse by defendants Trump and Epstein.
- That she was present and each of the four occasions of sexual abuse by Defendant Trump upon Cindy Doe, as it was her job to witness all of the sexual escapades of Defendant Epstein’s guests at these underage sex parties and later reveal all the sordid details directly to Defendant Epstein.
- Epstein also demanded Tiffany Doe tell him everything she overheard at these parties explaining to her that “knowledge was king”. As a result of the underage sex parties, Epstein was able to accumulate inside business knowledge he would otherwise not have been privy to, to amass his huge personal fortune.
EXCERPTED FROM NEW YORK CASE FILES:
ADDITIONAL CONTEXT
Plaintiff was subject to acts of rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts, sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional and reckless infliction of emotional distress, duress, false imprisonment, and threats of death and/or serious bodily injury by the Defendants that took place at several parties during the summer months of 1994. The parties were held by Defendant Epstein at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant Epstein at 9 E. 71st St. in Manhattan. During this period, Plaintiff was a minor of age 13 and was legally incapable under New York law of consenting to sexual intercourse and the other sexual contacts detailed herein. NY Penal L § 130.05(3)(a). The rapes in the first, second, and third degrees; sexual misconduct; criminal sexual acts in the first, second, and third degrees; sexual abuse in the first, second, and third degrees; and forcible touching (and, on information and belief, predatory sexual assault) detailed herein are unlawful under New York law, e.g., NY Penal L § 130.20-130.52, and 130.55-130.65 (and, on information and belief, 130.95) and constitute the torts of, inter alia, assault, battery, false imprisonment, and intentional or reckless infliction of emotional distress, including threats of force and serious bodily harm, under New York law. Declaration of Plaintiff Jane Doe, Exhibit A hereto; Declaration of Tiffany Doe, Exhibit B hereto. Jane Doe and Tiffany Doe are each pseudonyms as each woman wishes anonymity. Tiffany Doe, a witness, was an employee of Defendant Epstein. Exh. B.
Trumps Response:
“The allegations are not only categorically false, but disgusting at the highest level and clearly framed to solicit media attention or, perhaps, are simply politically motivated. There is absolutely no merit to these allegations. Period.”
But now, everyone that knows anything about Donald J. Trump knows this is one of his standard denials in situations like this, including in the case where he was convicted of sexual assault in New York (rape in most other jurisdictions). Blame the media, blame the victim, blame anyone but Donald.
The legal response to this statement is as follows: The published statement is libelous on its face, and clearly exposes Plaintiff to hatred, contempt, ridicule and obloquy.
It stands to reason Trump would deny this just as he denied knowing the woman he was convicted of raping in New York via the verdict of the court for sexual abuse according to New York Statutes. The case judge clarified the case by saying: “It could not find that he ‘raped’ her if it determined that Mr Trump forcibly penetrated Ms Carroll’s private sexual parts with his fingers – which commonly is considered ‘rape’ in other contexts – because the New York penal law definition of rape is limited to penile penetration.”
E. Jean Carrol is the woman that Donald Trump said was not his type and he never met her. During a deposition regarding the rape of E. Jean Caroll, when showed a photo of him meeting her, Trump identified her as his wife Marla. When the interviewer pointed out that he had pointed to E. Jean Carrol as his wife Marla Maples, demonstrating that she was in fact his type, he deflected and said well the photo is very blurry. But the photo is not blurry. Oddly, Donald was standing next to his wife Ivana Trump at the time and did not identify her at all in the interview.
Confronted with the Cindy Doe allegations, Donald Trump responded through his attorney: “It is categorically untrue. It is completely frivolous. It is baseless. It is irresponsible,” Trump attorney Alan Garten told POLITICO in September. “I won’t even discuss the merits because it gives it credibility that it doesn’t deserve.”
It is difficult to tell when Trump is ‘just’ lying of really does not know who he knows or is married to. The recent case of reports of Donald saying Trump saying about the Fed chair, that Trump appointed in his first term, Jerome Powell: “He’s a terrible Fed chair. I was surprised he was appointed” illustrates this point well. But that is only one example out of tens of thousands of lies and misleading statements by Trump, which are all documented.
Trump has lost around 450 civil cases of fraud and lost 35 federal cases when he was the sole owner of his company, which normally had around 10 to 16 employees. Donal d is known for micro-managing, but when asked about all these fraud claims and crimes Trump deflects and blames others or makes something up on the spot.
Those that still think Trump would never do something like this will likely dismiss the witness statements and believe the propaganda and Trumps dismissal. But it strains credulity when Trump says forget about Epstein and insults his MAGA base who really wanted Trump to fulfill his promise to release all the Epstein files, including the client list that multiple people form the Trump admin said were real. The more he denies it now, the more guilty he begins to look in the eyes of those that previously trusted him at his word.
But the funny thing is, everyone knows he lies, even his MAGA followers, and they do admit it when I speak with them. So it’s hard to reconcile why they would believe anything he says. The most common dismissal I’ve heard is all politicians lie. Well, that’s called a non sequitur in logic and reason. In other words it’s not reasonable. One thing is automatically related to the other. A person who lies all the time is different than one that lies once in a while or simply misleads for different reasons. Context is key and false equivalence is also a way to lie to ourselves and each other.
Cindy Doe’s attorney, Lisa Bloom, said the client was scared because of death threats. The case did not make it to court.
This still needs to go to court. Trump needs to be face these charges. The fact that he now has virtually his own gestapo in ICE, that is willing to sweep up and randomly beat and deport US citizens without warrants or evidence, is a testament to the depravity and danger of his authoritarian regime.
NOTE: I intended to include the link to the case file in from court filed in Riverside California. While I had located the file in the court documents previously, I was unable to locate that link now. This adds to suspicions regarding Donald Trumps ability to make negative references to him ‘go away’ from the public view. And he has demonstrated he is not afraid to destroy evidence. I can only wonder what is happening to the Epstein files right now under the protection of his hand picked sycophants in charge of our justice system.
The bigger concern now is will Trump’s DOJ, or FBI, or other agencies also make evidence ‘just go away’.’
April 2016 Case Filing PDF (download): Cindy Doe, Plaintiff v. Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, Defendants.
June 2016 Case Filing (download): JANE DOE, proceeding under a pseudonym, DONALD J. TRUMP and JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendants.
September 2016 Case Filing (download): JANE DOE, proceeding under a pseudonym, DONALD J. TRUMP and JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendants.
October 2016 Case Filing (download): JANE DOE, proceeding under a pseudonym, v. DONALD J. TRUMP and JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendants.
Additional Sources:
- Newsweek: Donald Trump, Katie Johnson Allegations: Everything We Know
- Courthousenews.com: Case 1:16-cv-04642-RA Document 1 Filed 06/20/16 – CDN FactCheck
- Wikipedia – Doe v. Trump
- Wikipedia – Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations
THIS REPORT MAY BE UPDATED
CASE PDF’s
April 2016 Case Filing PDF (download): Cindy Doe, Plaintiff v. Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, Defendants.
June 2016 Case Filing (download): JANE DOE, proceeding under a pseudonym, DONALD J. TRUMP and JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendants.
September 2016 Case Filing (download): JANE DOE, proceeding under a pseudonym, DONALD J. TRUMP and JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendants.
October 2016 Case Filing (download): JANE DOE, proceeding under a pseudonym, v. DONALD J. TRUMP and JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendants.
Additional Sources:
- Newsweek: Donald Trump, Katie Johnson Allegations: Everything We Know
- Courthousenews.com: Case 1:16-cv-04642-RA Document 1 Filed 06/20/16 – CDN FactCheck
- Wikipedia – Doe v. Trump
- Wikipedia – Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations
- Politico – First case filing: April 2016
THIS REPORT MAY BE UPDATED